Question 1 Report
A PE teacher needs to move footballs, rugby balls, bibs, and cones from the equipment store to the playing field each lesson. The teacher currently carries items in several trips, wasting lesson time. Fig 1 shows the equipment store with balls on shelves and bibs in a box. Design a sports equipment trolley for balls, bibs, and cones that one person can wheel across grass and store indoors when not in use.
(a) List four additional points about the function of such a sports equipment trolley for balls, bibs, and cones that you consider to be important. [4]
(b) Use sketches and notes to show two different wheel arrangements that would allow the trolley to roll over uneven grass. [4]
(c) Develop and sketch three ideas for the sports equipment trolley for balls, bibs, and cones. [12]
(d) Evaluate your ideas and justify why you have chosen one idea to develop more fully. [8]
(e) Draw, using a method of your own choice, a full solution to the problem. Include construction details and major dimensions. [12]
(f) Suggest suitable specific materials for your solution and give reasons for your choice. [4]
(g) Outline a method used to manufacture one part of your solution in the school workshop. [6]
[Total: 50]
(a) Four functional points [4 marks]
(b) Two wheel arrangements [4 marks]
Arrangement 1 — Four pneumatic wheels with front swivel castors: Four large (250 mm diameter) pneumatic-tyred wheels are mounted at the corners. The rear pair is fixed (providing straight-line tracking), and the front pair is mounted on swivel castors (allowing steering). The pneumatic tyres absorb bumps and provide grip on wet grass. The four-corner layout gives maximum stability. The swivel castors pivot freely, allowing the trolley to be turned in tight spaces. [2]
Arrangement 2 — Two large rear wheels with single front wheel (wheelbarrow layout): Two large (300 mm diameter) pneumatic wheels on a fixed rear axle bear most of the load. A single smaller wheel at the front provides a third contact point for stability. The user tips the handle slightly to lift the front wheel for steering, similar to a wheelbarrow. The wide rear tyres prevent sinking on soft ground. This three-point contact is stable on slopes but requires the user to balance the trolley slightly when turning. [2]
(c) Three design ideas [12 marks]
Idea 1 — Tiered cart with mesh ball cage, bib basket, and cone post: A welded mild steel tube frame on four large wheels. The top tier is a mesh-sided cage (approximately 600 mm x 400 mm x 400 mm) that holds up to 10 footballs or rugby balls, with a hinged mesh lid to prevent balls bouncing out during transport. A lower basket (mesh or nylon fabric) holds bibs with ventilation for drying. A vertical post (25 mm diameter tube, 500 mm tall) at one side stacks cones over the post. A tubular push handle extends from the rear. [4]
Idea 2 — Flat-bed trolley with removable dividers and mesh sides: A flat platform (1000 mm x 500 mm) on four wheels, with mesh side panels (300 mm tall) that fold down for compact storage. Removable plywood dividers slot into channels on the platform to create adjustable compartments. This design is versatile (dividers can be repositioned for different equipment mixes) but balls tend to roll around on a flat surface and can fall over the low sides. [4]
Idea 3 — Wheelbarrow-style unit with single deep bin: A deep V-shaped bin (600 mm x 400 mm x 500 mm deep) on two large rear wheels with handles at the back. Equipment is loaded into the single bin. The deep bin prevents items from falling out. Removable internal partitions separate ball, bib, and cone sections. The wheelbarrow design requires the user to lift and balance the handles, which is more tiring over long distances with a heavy load. [4]
(d) Evaluation and justification [8 marks]
Idea 1 (Tiered cart) — Strengths: dedicated sections keep equipment organised; mesh cage prevents balls escaping; cone post is efficient; four wheels give stability; push handle at comfortable height. Weaknesses: the welded frame requires metalworking skills.
Idea 2 (Flat-bed) — Strengths: versatile; flat-folding sides for storage. Weaknesses: balls roll on the flat surface; low sides risk items falling off; removable dividers can be lost.
Idea 3 (Wheelbarrow) — Strengths: deep bin prevents items falling out; simple construction. Weaknesses: user must lift and balance handles; tiring over distance; single bin makes finding specific items difficult.
Chosen idea: Idea 1. The tiered cart with dedicated sections provides the best organisation (each equipment type in its own compartment), the mesh ball cage prevents items escaping during transport across bumpy ground, and the four-wheel design allows one-person operation without lifting or balancing. The cone post is an efficient space-saving feature. The welded mild steel frame is strong enough for daily school use and achievable in a school workshop with MIG welding equipment. [8]
(e) Full solution — construction details [12 marks]
The solution is drawn in isometric projection with a plan view showing the compartment layout and a detail of the axle mounting.
(f) Materials [4 marks]
(g) Manufacturing the base frame [6 marks]
Everything you need to excel in your exams