Question 1 Report
Source G
The progress of the canal construction under American direction has been remarkable since the reorganization of the project in 1905. Chief Engineer John Stevens has introduced a railway-based excavation system that has dramatically increased the rate at which earth is removed from the Culebra Cut. The decision to build a lock canal rather than a sea-level canal has proven wise, reducing both the time and cost of the project. The greatest challenge remains the control of tropical diseases. Under the direction of Dr. William Gorgas, extensive drainage programs and mosquito control measures have reduced cases of yellow fever and malaria among the workforce, though casualties among laborers, particularly those from the West Indies, remain distressingly high.
From a report by the Isthmian Canal Commission, 1906.
Does this source accurately describe the challenges of building the Panama Canal? Explain your answer using details from the source and your knowledge. [7]
This question asks you to evaluate the usefulness of a source for understanding opposition to American imperialism. You must assess the source's content, provenance, and limitations.
What the source tells us: The senator's speech (January 1899) articulates key anti-imperialist arguments against taking the Philippines. He appeals to American founding principles, arguing that the Declaration of Independence's emphasis on "consent of the governed" is violated by imposing American rule on Filipinos. He references Emilio Aguinaldo's leadership of Filipino independence forces and draws a direct comparison between American imperialism and British colonial rule against which Americans had revolted.
Own knowledge supporting the source: The source reflects the views of the Anti-Imperialist League, formed in 1898, which included prominent figures such as Mark Twain, Andrew Carnegie, and former President Grover Cleveland. The arguments about consent and self-governance were central to anti-imperialist rhetoric. The Philippine-American War (1899-1902) that followed would cost over 4,000 American and an estimated 200,000 Filipino lives, demonstrating the accuracy of the senator's warning about the "cost in lives and treasure."
Limitations of the source:
Reaching Level 3 (5-6 marks): The best answers recognise the source as useful for understanding the specific arguments used by anti-imperialists but limited in scope. It captures the principled opposition based on democratic values but does not represent the full range of anti-imperialist motivations or the counterarguments of expansionists. Using specific own knowledge (Anti-Imperialist League, Philippine-American War casualty figures) shows you can evaluate the source's claims against the historical record.
Everything you need to excel in your exams