Question 1 Report
A technician prepared a report for PPS Furniture Studio after observing its workshop for one month. Fig. 1 shows a modular desk being assembled. PPS designs desks for customers who work in small flats. The business has received positive comments about its design, but delivery times are often 18 days because components arrive late. A competitor offers cheaper standard desks, while PPS has only $9 000 available for improvement. The owner can either hold more components in stock or pay for a faster supplier. She wants to build a successful business with a clear competitive advantage.
(a) Define the term unique selling point (USP). [2]
(b) State two features of PPS Furniture Studio's product that could be a USP. [2]
(c) Analyse why reliable delivery may be important to the success of PPS Furniture Studio. [5]
(d) Justify which option the owner should select to improve delivery: holding more stock or using a faster supplier. [7]
(a) A unique selling point, USP, is a feature or benefit that makes a product different from competitors' products [1] and gives customers a reason to choose it [1]. [2]
(b) PPS's modular design and its suitability for small flats are two possible USPs. Folding or space-saving sections, built-in storage and customer-designed desks would also be valid. [2]
(c) Customers expect a desk by the agreed date [1]. Late delivery causes dissatisfaction [1], and customers may cancel orders or ask for refunds [1]. Poor reviews can damage PPS's reputation [1], which matters because furniture buyers may look at reviews before ordering [1]. Reliable delivery encourages recommendations and repeat purchases, improves sales and profit, and can differentiate PPS from cheaper standard-desk competitors. [5]
(d) Holding more stock reduces the chance that a missing component stops production [1], so it could shorten the present 18-day wait [1]. It gives PPS more control over production [1], but ties up scarce cash in components [1] and creates a risk that stock is damaged or becomes obsolete [1].
A faster supplier reduces lead times without PPS holding large quantities [1], but may charge higher prices and reduce the profit margin [1]. The best choice is a faster supplier if its additional cost is less than the lost profit and reputational damage caused by late deliveries [1]. If demand is predictable and storage is cheap, holding a limited safety stock is justified [1]. [7]
Everything you need to excel in your exams