Question 1 Report
A wildlife conservation project in Borneo has been using camera traps to study the species diversity in a protected lowland rainforest. Fifty camera trap stations were placed at intervals along existing animal trails and near water sources to maximise the chance of detecting different species. Table 4.1 shows the results from 50 camera trap stations over a 12-month period.
| Species detected | Number of camera stations detecting species | Total detections (12 months) | Conservation status (IUCN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild boar | 48 | 2450 | Least Concern |
| Barking deer | 42 | 1860 | Least Concern |
| Sambar deer | 35 | 980 | Vulnerable |
| Clouded leopard | 8 | 45 | Vulnerable |
| Asian elephant | 12 | 120 | Endangered |
| Sun bear | 6 | 28 | Vulnerable |
| Tiger | 3 | 12 | Endangered |
| Pangolin | 2 | 5 | Critically Endangered |
Fig. 4.1 shows the total number of camera trap detections for each species over the 12-month study period.
(a) Using Table 4.1, identify the most commonly detected species and the rarest species. [2]
(b) Suggest why large predators such as the tiger were detected at very few camera stations. [2]
(c) Explain two advantages of using camera traps for monitoring wildlife populations compared to direct observation by researchers. [2]
(d) The pangolin is classified as Critically Endangered. Explain what this classification means and describe two threats that have caused pangolin populations to decline. [3]
(e) Describe how the data from this camera trap study could be used to design a more effective conservation plan for the protected forest. [4]
(a) Species identification from Table 4.1: [2]
(b) Why large predators like the tiger were detected at very few stations: [2]
(c) Two advantages of camera traps over direct observation: [2]
(d) The Critically Endangered classification and threats to pangolins: [3]
(e) How camera trap data could inform a conservation plan: [4]
Everything you need to excel in your exams