A group of students investigated the effect of trampling on plant species in a park. They placed quadrats along a transect from a footpath into the surround...

Assessment: Environmental Management 0680 | Paper 1 Mock 01 | Principles of Environmental Management Subject: Environmental Management - 0680

Question 1 Report

A group of students investigated the effect of trampling on plant species in a park. They placed quadrats along a transect from a footpath into the surrounding grassland. Fig. 1.8 shows their results.

diagram

Environmental management involves understanding how human activities affect the natural world and developing strategies to reduce negative impacts. The growing global population places increasing pressure on natural resources and ecosystems.

Population policies range from pro-natalist measures that encourage larger families to anti-natalist programmes that promote family planning and smaller families.

(a) State the percentage cover of grass species at 4 m from the footpath. [1]

(b) Describe the trend shown by the data for grass species as distance from the footpath increases. [3]

(c) Compare the effect of trampling on grass species and wildflowers. [3]

(d) Explain why trampling reduces the percentage cover of plants near the footpath. [4]

Answer Details

(a) Percentage cover of grass species at 4 m from the footpath [1]

Approximately 50% (accept 48-52%). [1]

This value is read from the graph (Fig. 1.8) by finding 4 m on the x-axis and reading across to the solid line for grass species, then down to the y-axis.

(b) Trend in grass species cover with increasing distance [3]

  1. The percentage cover of grass species increases as distance from the footpath increases. [1]
  2. Cover rises from approximately 5% at 0 m (on the footpath) to about 90% at 10 m from the footpath. [1]
  3. The rate of increase is steepest between 2 m and 6 m, after which the curve begins to level off, suggesting that beyond about 8 m the effect of trampling is negligible. [1]

(c) Comparison of trampling effects on grass species and wildflowers [3]

  1. Both grass species and wildflowers show lower percentage cover near the footpath and higher cover further away, indicating that trampling reduces the abundance of both groups. [1]
  2. Grass species show a greater overall range of increase (from about 5% to about 90%) compared to wildflowers (from about 2% to about 50%), meaning grasses recover more than wildflowers. [1]
  3. Grass species reach a higher maximum percentage cover than wildflowers at all distances, suggesting that grasses are the dominant plant group in undisturbed areas and are better able to recolonise disturbed ground. [1]

(d) Why trampling reduces plant cover near the footpath [4]

  1. Trampling compresses and compacts the soil, reducing air spaces between soil particles and making it harder for roots to penetrate and grow. [1]
  2. The physical impact of feet on vegetation breaks stems and leaves, killing or stunting plant growth directly. [1]
  3. Compacted soil has reduced water infiltration because the smaller pore spaces prevent rainwater from soaking in. Less water is therefore available for plant uptake. [1]
  4. Repeated trampling prevents seedlings from germinating and establishing, reducing the ability of plant populations to regenerate and maintain their cover. [1]

Download The App On Google Playstore

Everything you need to excel in your exams

Green Bridge CBT Mobile App
Personalized AI Learning Chat Assistant
200,000+ Exam Questions Across IGCSE, JAMB, WAEC & NECO
Over 3,900 Lesson Notes
Offline Support - Learn Anytime, Anywhere
Green Bridge Timetable
Literature Summaries & Potential Questions
Track Your Performance & Progress
In-depth Explanations for Comprehensive Learning