Question 1 Report
Assignment 2: Describe
Write a descriptive piece about a railway terminus at dawn, as the overnight services come in and the platform vendors set out their stalls.
Your aim is to put a reader inside the scene, not to tell a story about it. Hold the piece to a single stretch of time, from the first grey light to the point at which the concourse is fully working, and let the detail carry the writing.
Your piece should:
Write 500 to 800 words. This assignment carries 25 marks, all of them for Writing.
Description is not narration, and the difference decides your mark
This assignment carries 25 marks, all for Writing, against W1 to W5. There are no Reading marks, so the piece is judged entirely on how it is composed and expressed. The first thing to be clear about is what kind of piece it is. A narrative asks what happens next; a description asks what is it like to be here. The moment a train is late, a vendor drops a tray and a stranger helps to pick it up, you have started a story, and the descriptive writing stops developing. The examiner's Level 4 descriptor names this exactly: the writing occasionally slips into telling a story.
That does not mean nothing may move. A railway terminus at dawn is full of movement, and the brief gives you a stretch of time to work with: from the first grey light to the point at which the concourse is fully working. Movement is fine. Consequence is not. Nothing that happens in your piece should change what happens later in it.
Sustaining one impression across 500 to 800 words
Without a plot, the thing that holds a description together is a single governing impression, decided before you write. For this scene the honest candidates are cold and grey giving way to warmth and noise; the strangeness of a public building in its private hour; or the contrast between arriving passengers who have been travelling all night and vendors who are just beginning their day. Choose one. Every detail you then admit into the piece should serve it, and a detail that does not, however good, belongs in the cut file.
Structure supplies the rest. You need an organising principle strong enough that the reader always knows where they are standing. Three work well here:
Whichever you pick, hold one vantage point and one tense throughout. Drifting between a narrator standing on the platform and an aerial view of the station is the commonest reason a competent description reads as unshaped.
Techniques keyed to this subject
Common failure modes for this subject
Writing: 25 marks (W1 to W5)
W1 articulate experience and express what is thought, felt and imagined. W2 arrange and shape ideas so the order itself works for effect. W3 draw on varied word choices and sentence patterns that fit the situation. W4 pitch formality and tone to suit the situation. W5 spell, punctuate and use grammar accurately.
| Level | Marks | Description |
| Level 6 | 22-25 | Sustained and evocative. The description builds one strong, coherent impression and holds it, conveying what is seen, heard, smelled and felt with real imaginative force (W1). The order of the piece is itself an effect: the reader is moved through the scene deliberately and the close is shaped rather than merely reached (W2). Vocabulary is precise and concrete, verbs do the work that weaker writing gives to adjectives, and figurative language is used sparingly and to purpose (W3). The register suits a piece written to be read for its own sake (W4). Spelling, punctuation and grammar are secure throughout (W5). |
| Level 5 | 18-21 | Convincing. A clear sense of place is built from well-chosen sensory detail, and the writing holds the reader (W1). The structure is purposeful and the piece moves with control, though one section may carry more weight than the rest (W2). Vocabulary is varied and mostly precise, imagery is effective and sentence structures show genuine variety (W3, W4). Accuracy is good, with minor errors (W5). |
| Level 4 | 14-17 | Competent. The scene is recognisable and more than one sense is engaged, but detail is generalised in places and the writing occasionally slips into telling a story (W1). The structure is orderly but predictable (W2). Vocabulary is adequate, imagery is conventional and sentence variety is limited (W3, W4). Errors are noticeable but do not obscure meaning (W5). |
| Level 3 | 10-13 | Straightforward. The subject is described in plain terms and the writing relies mainly on sight (W1). Organisation is a loose list of features rather than a shaped piece (W2). Vocabulary is repetitive and leans on adjectives instead of precise nouns and strong verbs (W3, W4). Errors are frequent and sometimes blur the sense (W5). |
| Level 2 | 6-9 | Weak. Only a vague sense of the scene emerges, and the piece drifts into narrative or explanation (W1, W2). Vocabulary is narrow, sentences are often faulty and errors impede reading (W3, W4, W5). |
| Level 1 | 1-5 | Very weak. Isolated relevant details, little or no structure, and severe limitations in vocabulary and accuracy. |
| 0 marks | 0 | Nothing in the writing is worthy of credit. |
Working method for the portfolio
Because this is coursework, the redraft is where the marks are. Draft it once to find the scene, then go through the draft with three separate passes: one that deletes every detail not serving your chosen impression, one that replaces vague nouns and weak verb-plus-adverb pairs with exact words, and one that reads the piece aloud to check sentence rhythm and to catch the accuracy errors that W5 rewards. Keep the finished piece inside 500 to 800 words; under that range a description rarely develops far enough to reach the upper levels, and over it, control of shape and accuracy tends to slip.
Everything you need to excel in your exams