Identify five (5) weaknesses of the Independence Constitution of 1960.
The Independence Constitution of 1960, though it granted Nigeria self-rule, had a number of weaknesses:
Retention of the British monarch as Head of State: Nigeria remained under the Queen, represented by a Governor-General, so the country was not yet a full republic and independence was incomplete.
Appeals still lay to the Privy Council in London: The final court of appeal remained the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain, which detracted from full judicial sovereignty.
Human rights were not fully guaranteed or entrenched in a way that could not be tampered with: Although rights were provided for, the protections were weakened by wide exceptions, and enforcement machinery was inadequate.
It entrenched strong regionalism at the expense of the centre: By giving the regions great power, it encouraged regional and ethnic loyalties that threatened national unity.
Domination by the three major regions: The structure allowed the three large regions to dominate the minorities, whose fears and demands for separate states were not adequately met.
The amendment procedure was rigid and cumbersome: Changing the constitution required difficult procedures involving the regions, making needed reforms hard to achieve.
It was largely a product of compromise imposed from outside: Being negotiated at conferences dominated by British interests, it did not fully reflect the wishes of the people.
The Independence Constitution of 1960, though it granted Nigeria self-rule, had a number of weaknesses:
Retention of the British monarch as Head of State: Nigeria remained under the Queen, represented by a Governor-General, so the country was not yet a full republic and independence was incomplete.
Appeals still lay to the Privy Council in London: The final court of appeal remained the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain, which detracted from full judicial sovereignty.
Human rights were not fully guaranteed or entrenched in a way that could not be tampered with: Although rights were provided for, the protections were weakened by wide exceptions, and enforcement machinery was inadequate.
It entrenched strong regionalism at the expense of the centre: By giving the regions great power, it encouraged regional and ethnic loyalties that threatened national unity.
Domination by the three major regions: The structure allowed the three large regions to dominate the minorities, whose fears and demands for separate states were not adequately met.
The amendment procedure was rigid and cumbersome: Changing the constitution required difficult procedures involving the regions, making needed reforms hard to achieve.
It was largely a product of compromise imposed from outside: Being negotiated at conferences dominated by British interests, it did not fully reflect the wishes of the people.