You are the main speaker in a debate on the topic: Children of literate parents perform better in school than those of illiterate parents. Write your argume...

Answer Details

Model answer: debate speech (arguing FOR the motion)

Mr Chairman, accurate timekeeper, panel of judges, my co-debaters, ladies and gentlemen. I stand before you to speak in support of the motion that children of literate parents perform better in school than those of illiterate parents.

My first point is that literate parents can guide their children in their studies. They understand what the child is being taught, help with homework, explain difficult topics and monitor progress. The child of an illiterate parent, however willing, receives no such help at home.

Secondly, literate parents provide a home rich in learning. Their homes usually contain books, newspapers and a quiet place to study, and the children see their parents reading. This atmosphere encourages the child to value education and to read widely.

Thirdly, literate parents appreciate the importance of education and are ready to invest in it. They pay fees promptly, buy the necessary books and take interest in the child's school, attending meetings and asking questions. This support naturally spurs the child to greater performance.

My opponents may argue that many great men rose from illiterate homes. I concede that hard work and determination matter, but such cases are exceptions; the general truth remains that a supportive, educated home gives a child a clear advantage.

Mr Chairman, for these weighty reasons, I firmly urge this house to support the motion. Thank you.

Key features expected: full debate opening with vocatives; a clear stand (for or against); at least three well-developed arguments; a concession or rebuttal of the opposing view; a firm concluding appeal. A candidate may equally argue AGAINST, stressing determination, government support, hard-working teachers and successful people from illiterate homes.