You have been invited to take part in an inter-school debate, the topic of which is: Schooling in a village is more advantageous than schooling in a city. Write your speech for or against the motion.
Mr Chairman, timekeeper, respected judges, my able opponents, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, I rise to speak in support of the motion, that schooling in a village is more advantageous than schooling in a city.
My first point is the peaceful environment a village offers. Away from the roar of traffic, the blare of horns and the restless bustle of the city, a village school is quiet and calm. In such surroundings a student can concentrate fully on his studies, and a settled mind learns far more easily than a distracted one.
Secondly, life in a village is free from the many temptations of the city. There are no night clubs, cinemas or crowded arcades to lure young people away from their books. The village child grows up in a wholesome atmosphere that guards his morals and keeps his mind on his education.
Thirdly, schooling in a village is far cheaper. Rent, food and transport all cost less than in the city, so parents can afford to keep their children in school without crippling expense, and the children themselves live simpler, healthier lives.
Fourthly, the village fosters strong community bonds and discipline. Teachers, parents and elders all know one another, so a child's conduct is watched over on every side. This close supervision keeps students diligent and well behaved.
My opponents will boast of the superior facilities of city schools. Yet many great scholars and leaders rose from humble village schools, proving that it is the diligent mind, not the dazzling building, that determines success.
On the grounds of a peaceful environment, freedom from temptation, lower cost and close supervision, I confidently urge this house to support the motion. Thank you.