Question 1 Report
Two quadratic inequalities, 8 marks in total. The method for both is the same: get everything on one side, factorise, find the critical values, and then decide the sign of the expression in each region. A sketch of the parabola or a sign table is what makes the last step reliable. The second part carries the extra trap of a variable denominator.
Factorise first: \[2x^2 - 5x - 3 = (2x + 1)(x - 3) \quad \textbf{M1}\] The M1 is for an attempt to factorise or to solve the quadratic; the formula or completing the square would earn it equally. The critical values are where the expression is zero: \[x = -\tfrac{1}{2} \quad \text{and} \quad x = 3 \quad \textbf{A1}\] Now the sign. The coefficient of \(x^2\) is positive, so the parabola opens upwards and lies above the axis outside its two roots and below between them. Since we want the expression to be positive, \[x \lt -\tfrac{1}{2} \quad \text{or} \quad x \gt 3 \quad \textbf{A1}\] The final A1 needs both regions and the word "or". Writing \(-\tfrac{1}{2} \gt x \gt 3\) is meaningless, because no number is simultaneously less than \(-\tfrac{1}{2}\) and greater than 3.
The one thing you must not do is multiply both sides by \((x - 2)\), because that expression changes sign at \(x = 2\) and multiplying an inequality by a negative quantity reverses it. The safe manoeuvre is to multiply by \((x - 2)^2\), which is positive for every \(x \ne 2\) and so leaves the inequality sign alone. Record the excluded value first: \(x \ne 2\), since the original expression is undefined there.
\[(x + 4)(x - 2) \le 3(x - 2)^2 \quad \textbf{M1}\] \[x^2 + 2x - 8 \le 3x^2 - 12x + 12 \quad \textbf{A1}\] \[0 \le 2x^2 - 14x + 20 \ \Rightarrow\ x^2 - 7x + 10 \ge 0 \quad \textbf{A1}\] \[(x - 2)(x - 5) \ge 0 \ \Rightarrow\ x \le 2 \ \text{or} \ x \ge 5 \quad \textbf{M1}\]Finally impose the exclusion. The value \(x = 2\) satisfies \((x-2)(x-5) \ge 0\) but is not in the domain of the original inequality, so it must be removed: \[x \lt 2 \quad \text{or} \quad x \ge 5 \quad \textbf{A1}\] The second M1 is for solving the new quadratic inequality correctly in structure; the last A1 is reserved for the fully correct final set, including the strict inequality at \(x = 2\) and the inclusive one at \(x = 5\). The A marks are not follow-through, so an expansion slip earlier costs them.
An alternative route that also earns full marks is to subtract 3 and combine into a single fraction: \[\frac{x+4}{x-2} - 3 = \frac{x + 4 - 3(x-2)}{x-2} = \frac{10 - 2x}{x - 2} \le 0,\] then use a sign table on the critical values \(x = 2\) and \(x = 5\). Both routes must end with \(x = 2\) excluded.
Test one value from each region. In part (a), \(x = 0\) gives \(-3\), which is not positive, correctly excluding the middle region; \(x = 4\) gives \(9 \gt 0\). In part (b), \(x = 0\) gives \(\dfrac{4}{-2} = -2 \le 3\), so \(x \lt 2\) belongs; \(x = 3\) gives \(\dfrac{7}{1} = 7\), which is not at most 3, so the middle region is correctly excluded; \(x = 5\) gives exactly \(\dfrac{9}{3} = 3\), so the boundary is correctly inclusive. Three substitutions settle a whole inequality.
Everything you need to excel in your exams