One of the arguments against delegated legislation is that it
Answer Details
Delegated legislation is a type of legislation that allows the government or other bodies to make laws without the direct involvement of parliament. One of the arguments against delegated legislation is that it goes against the principle of separation of powers. This principle states that the powers of government should be separated into three branches: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. Each branch should have separate and distinct powers, and there should be a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch becomes too powerful.
Delegated legislation allows the executive branch to make laws, which can encroach on the powers of the legislature and undermine the system of checks and balances. This can lead to an imbalance of power, with the executive branch becoming too dominant.
Additionally, delegated legislation can be used to promote limited government, which means that the government has limited powers and should not interfere in the lives of citizens more than necessary. However, this can also mean that the government is not able to respond to changing circumstances or address important issues that require new laws.
Finally, delegated legislation can be time-consuming and wasteful, as it requires the attention of both the executive and the legislature. This can slow down the legislative process and lead to delays in passing important laws.