Cargando....
|
Mantén pulsado para arrastrar. |
|||
|
Haz clic aquí para cerrar |
|||
Pregunta 1 Informe
AFRICAN PROSE
ADICHIE CHIMAMANDA NGOZI: Purple Hibiscus
Compare Aunt Ifeoma and her brother's relationship with their children.
In Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Purple Hibiscus, Aunt Ifeoma and her brother Eugene (Papa) offer a sharp contrast in the way they relate to their children. The novel sets their two households side by side so that the reader may weigh a loving, liberal upbringing against a harsh, tyrannical one.
Eugene: authority through fear and religion. Eugene rules his children, Kambili and Jaja, with rigid discipline enforced by violence. Everything in his home runs to a strict schedule; a poor showing at school or any lapse from his fanatical Catholic standards is punished cruelly. He pours boiling water on his children's feet for staying under the same roof as their "heathen" grandfather and beats Kambili almost to death for keeping a painting of Papa-Nnukwu. His love is real but distorted into control, and it silences his children, leaving Kambili timid and tongue-tied.
Ifeoma: authority through love and freedom. By contrast, Aunt Ifeoma raises her children, Amaka, Obiora and Chima, in an atmosphere of warmth, laughter and open discussion. Though poor, her home in Nsukka is full of life. She encourages her children to ask questions, to argue, to think for themselves and to laugh freely. She is firm but never brutal; her discipline is grounded in reason and affection rather than fear.
The effect on the children. Eugene's children are repressed and fearful, unable to speak their minds, whereas Ifeoma's children are confident, outspoken and independent. Amaka is bold and questioning, a mirror of the freedom Kambili lacks. It is only when Kambili and Jaja spend time in Ifeoma's household that they begin to find their voices and to blossom, Kambili learning to smile and even to love, Jaja learning to defy his father.
The larger meaning. Through this comparison Adichie explores contrasting models of parenting and authority, and by extension of governance and faith. Ifeoma's home represents freedom, tolerance and growth; Eugene's represents oppression masked as piety. The novel clearly endorses love and liberty over fear.
In sum, brother and sister relate to their children in opposite ways, and the contrast drives home the novel's central concern with the destructive effects of authoritarianism and the liberating power of love.
Detalles de la respuesta
In Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Purple Hibiscus, Aunt Ifeoma and her brother Eugene (Papa) offer a sharp contrast in the way they relate to their children. The novel sets their two households side by side so that the reader may weigh a loving, liberal upbringing against a harsh, tyrannical one.
Eugene: authority through fear and religion. Eugene rules his children, Kambili and Jaja, with rigid discipline enforced by violence. Everything in his home runs to a strict schedule; a poor showing at school or any lapse from his fanatical Catholic standards is punished cruelly. He pours boiling water on his children's feet for staying under the same roof as their "heathen" grandfather and beats Kambili almost to death for keeping a painting of Papa-Nnukwu. His love is real but distorted into control, and it silences his children, leaving Kambili timid and tongue-tied.
Ifeoma: authority through love and freedom. By contrast, Aunt Ifeoma raises her children, Amaka, Obiora and Chima, in an atmosphere of warmth, laughter and open discussion. Though poor, her home in Nsukka is full of life. She encourages her children to ask questions, to argue, to think for themselves and to laugh freely. She is firm but never brutal; her discipline is grounded in reason and affection rather than fear.
The effect on the children. Eugene's children are repressed and fearful, unable to speak their minds, whereas Ifeoma's children are confident, outspoken and independent. Amaka is bold and questioning, a mirror of the freedom Kambili lacks. It is only when Kambili and Jaja spend time in Ifeoma's household that they begin to find their voices and to blossom, Kambili learning to smile and even to love, Jaja learning to defy his father.
The larger meaning. Through this comparison Adichie explores contrasting models of parenting and authority, and by extension of governance and faith. Ifeoma's home represents freedom, tolerance and growth; Eugene's represents oppression masked as piety. The novel clearly endorses love and liberty over fear.
In sum, brother and sister relate to their children in opposite ways, and the contrast drives home the novel's central concern with the destructive effects of authoritarianism and the liberating power of love.
Pregunta 2 Informe
NON — AFRICAN PROSE
ERNEST HEMINGWAY: The Old Man and The Sea
Examine the use of flashback and monologue in the novel.
Ernest Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea is a spare, tightly focused novel with only one central character alone at sea for most of its length. To open out Santiago's world and reveal his inner life, Hemingway relies heavily on two devices: flashback (memory) and monologue (speech and thought). Both are essential to the novel's meaning.
Flashback deepens character and hope. Because Santiago spends most of the story alone, his memories carry much of the narrative weight. He recalls the great arm-wrestling contest in Casablanca, when as a young man he beat the powerful black man in a match that lasted a day and a night. This memory reassures him of his own strength and endurance at the very moment his old body is failing against the marlin. He also remembers the lions he saw on the African beaches in his youth, a recurring image of vigour, innocence and peace that returns in his dreams and sustains his spirit. Through such flashbacks the reader learns of Santiago's past prowess and understands the pride and stamina he still commands.
Monologue reveals thought and endurance. Alone in the skiff, Santiago talks aloud, to himself, to the fish, to the birds and to his absent friend the boy Manolin. This spoken monologue, together with his running interior reflection, lets Hemingway convey the old man's courage, his strategy in the fight, his moments of doubt and his stubborn determination. His repeated wish, "I wish the boy were here", expresses his loneliness and his need for companionship. His reflections on the marlin, whom he addresses as a worthy brother, reveal his respect for his adversary and his complex feelings about killing so noble a creature.
Combined effect. Flashback supplies the depth of a lifetime behind the present ordeal, while monologue makes the solitary struggle dramatic and intimate. Together they turn what could have been a bare fishing anecdote into a profound study of courage, dignity and the human capacity to endure.
Hemingway therefore uses flashback and monologue not as ornament but as the very means by which a solitary man's heroism is made visible to the reader.
Detalles de la respuesta
Ernest Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea is a spare, tightly focused novel with only one central character alone at sea for most of its length. To open out Santiago's world and reveal his inner life, Hemingway relies heavily on two devices: flashback (memory) and monologue (speech and thought). Both are essential to the novel's meaning.
Flashback deepens character and hope. Because Santiago spends most of the story alone, his memories carry much of the narrative weight. He recalls the great arm-wrestling contest in Casablanca, when as a young man he beat the powerful black man in a match that lasted a day and a night. This memory reassures him of his own strength and endurance at the very moment his old body is failing against the marlin. He also remembers the lions he saw on the African beaches in his youth, a recurring image of vigour, innocence and peace that returns in his dreams and sustains his spirit. Through such flashbacks the reader learns of Santiago's past prowess and understands the pride and stamina he still commands.
Monologue reveals thought and endurance. Alone in the skiff, Santiago talks aloud, to himself, to the fish, to the birds and to his absent friend the boy Manolin. This spoken monologue, together with his running interior reflection, lets Hemingway convey the old man's courage, his strategy in the fight, his moments of doubt and his stubborn determination. His repeated wish, "I wish the boy were here", expresses his loneliness and his need for companionship. His reflections on the marlin, whom he addresses as a worthy brother, reveal his respect for his adversary and his complex feelings about killing so noble a creature.
Combined effect. Flashback supplies the depth of a lifetime behind the present ordeal, while monologue makes the solitary struggle dramatic and intimate. Together they turn what could have been a bare fishing anecdote into a profound study of courage, dignity and the human capacity to endure.
Hemingway therefore uses flashback and monologue not as ornament but as the very means by which a solitary man's heroism is made visible to the reader.
Pregunta 3 Informe
AFRICAN PROSE
ASARE KONADU: A Woman In Her Prime
How does Pokuwaa cope with tradition in the novel?
In Asare Konadu's A Woman in Her Prime, Pokuwaa's central struggle is with the weight of tradition, especially the customs and beliefs of her Akan community concerning childbearing, marriage and the ancestors. The novel traces the many ways in which she both submits to and gradually frees herself from these traditional demands.
Submission through ritual and sacrifice. Because she is childless, Pokuwaa is expected to seek the help of the gods. She dutifully observes the prescriptions of the priest and the fetish, offering the required sacrifices, including the ritual killing of a sheep, and following every instruction in the hope of conceiving. Her patient obedience shows her honouring the traditional path even at great personal cost.
Enduring social pressure. A barren woman in her society is pitied and blamed, and Pokuwaa bears the whispers and expectations of the community. She copes by remaining steadfast, continuing her farm work and daily duties with dignity despite the stigma of childlessness.
Marriage and the customs of divorce. Pokuwaa's relationships with her husbands are governed by custom. She marries, separates and marries again within the framework her society allows, and she manages these transitions according to accepted practice while retaining a quiet independence of spirit.
Growing self-reliance and questioning. As the novel develops, Pokuwaa begins to move beyond blind dependence on ritual. She comes to place greater trust in her own effort, in nature and in a more personal faith, no longer believing that endless sacrifice is the only answer. When she at last conceives, it is presented less as the reward of the fetish than as the fruit of patience and natural process, subtly questioning the old beliefs.
Balance rather than rebellion. Pokuwaa does not violently reject tradition; she copes by combining respectful observance with a maturing personal judgement, keeping what sustains her and quietly loosening the grip of what does not.
Through Pokuwaa, Konadu portrays a woman who navigates tradition with patience, obedience and, finally, a measure of self-liberation, embodying the tension between communal custom and individual growth.
Detalles de la respuesta
In Asare Konadu's A Woman in Her Prime, Pokuwaa's central struggle is with the weight of tradition, especially the customs and beliefs of her Akan community concerning childbearing, marriage and the ancestors. The novel traces the many ways in which she both submits to and gradually frees herself from these traditional demands.
Submission through ritual and sacrifice. Because she is childless, Pokuwaa is expected to seek the help of the gods. She dutifully observes the prescriptions of the priest and the fetish, offering the required sacrifices, including the ritual killing of a sheep, and following every instruction in the hope of conceiving. Her patient obedience shows her honouring the traditional path even at great personal cost.
Enduring social pressure. A barren woman in her society is pitied and blamed, and Pokuwaa bears the whispers and expectations of the community. She copes by remaining steadfast, continuing her farm work and daily duties with dignity despite the stigma of childlessness.
Marriage and the customs of divorce. Pokuwaa's relationships with her husbands are governed by custom. She marries, separates and marries again within the framework her society allows, and she manages these transitions according to accepted practice while retaining a quiet independence of spirit.
Growing self-reliance and questioning. As the novel develops, Pokuwaa begins to move beyond blind dependence on ritual. She comes to place greater trust in her own effort, in nature and in a more personal faith, no longer believing that endless sacrifice is the only answer. When she at last conceives, it is presented less as the reward of the fetish than as the fruit of patience and natural process, subtly questioning the old beliefs.
Balance rather than rebellion. Pokuwaa does not violently reject tradition; she copes by combining respectful observance with a maturing personal judgement, keeping what sustains her and quietly loosening the grip of what does not.
Through Pokuwaa, Konadu portrays a woman who navigates tradition with patience, obedience and, finally, a measure of self-liberation, embodying the tension between communal custom and individual growth.
Pregunta 4 Informe
AFRICAN PROSE
ADICHIE CHIMAMANDA NGOZI: Purple Hibiscus
Examine the role of Papa-Nnukwu in the novel.
Papa-Nnukwu, the aged father of Eugene and Ifeoma, plays a role in Purple Hibiscus that is out of all proportion to the little time he actually spends on the page. As a devoted traditionalist and a figure of natural warmth, he stands at the centre of the novel's conflict between rigid fanaticism and tolerant humanity.
He embodies Igbo tradition. Papa-Nnukwu is a practising traditionalist who worships according to the customs of his ancestors. His morning ritual of itu-nzu, drawing lines and giving thanks to his chi, which Kambili secretly watches, is presented as beautiful, sincere and full of gratitude. Through him Adichie affirms the dignity and spiritual richness of indigenous religion, countering the assumption that it is mere "heathenism".
He is the foil to Eugene's fanaticism. Eugene rejects and despises his own father because the old man will not convert to Catholicism, refusing even to let his children stay long under his roof. Papa-Nnukwu's gentle, forgiving nature throws Eugene's cruelty and intolerance into sharp relief. The father is loving and open; the son is harsh and closed. This contrast exposes the destructiveness of Eugene's fanatical faith.
He awakens Kambili and Jaja. Time spent with Papa-Nnukwu in Nsukka opens the children's eyes. Kambili comes to love and admire her grandfather, and her secret devotion to him, symbolised by the painting she risks so much to keep, marks the beginning of her inner liberation. He helps the young people to question the narrow world their father has built.
His death is a turning point. The old man's death, and Eugene's callous response to it, deepens the family crisis and hardens Jaja's growing rebellion. Papa-Nnukwu's passing also occasions Amaka's grief and the painting episode that triggers Eugene's most savage violence against Kambili.
He symbolises reconciliation and cultural pride. Papa-Nnukwu represents the possibility of holding faith and love together without cruelty, and he stands for a heritage the novel urges its characters not to despise.
Though a minor presence in terms of appearances, Papa-Nnukwu is thematically central: he embodies tradition, exposes fanaticism, and helps the children towards freedom.
Detalles de la respuesta
Papa-Nnukwu, the aged father of Eugene and Ifeoma, plays a role in Purple Hibiscus that is out of all proportion to the little time he actually spends on the page. As a devoted traditionalist and a figure of natural warmth, he stands at the centre of the novel's conflict between rigid fanaticism and tolerant humanity.
He embodies Igbo tradition. Papa-Nnukwu is a practising traditionalist who worships according to the customs of his ancestors. His morning ritual of itu-nzu, drawing lines and giving thanks to his chi, which Kambili secretly watches, is presented as beautiful, sincere and full of gratitude. Through him Adichie affirms the dignity and spiritual richness of indigenous religion, countering the assumption that it is mere "heathenism".
He is the foil to Eugene's fanaticism. Eugene rejects and despises his own father because the old man will not convert to Catholicism, refusing even to let his children stay long under his roof. Papa-Nnukwu's gentle, forgiving nature throws Eugene's cruelty and intolerance into sharp relief. The father is loving and open; the son is harsh and closed. This contrast exposes the destructiveness of Eugene's fanatical faith.
He awakens Kambili and Jaja. Time spent with Papa-Nnukwu in Nsukka opens the children's eyes. Kambili comes to love and admire her grandfather, and her secret devotion to him, symbolised by the painting she risks so much to keep, marks the beginning of her inner liberation. He helps the young people to question the narrow world their father has built.
His death is a turning point. The old man's death, and Eugene's callous response to it, deepens the family crisis and hardens Jaja's growing rebellion. Papa-Nnukwu's passing also occasions Amaka's grief and the painting episode that triggers Eugene's most savage violence against Kambili.
He symbolises reconciliation and cultural pride. Papa-Nnukwu represents the possibility of holding faith and love together without cruelty, and he stands for a heritage the novel urges its characters not to despise.
Though a minor presence in terms of appearances, Papa-Nnukwu is thematically central: he embodies tradition, exposes fanaticism, and helps the children towards freedom.
Pregunta 5 Informe
NON — AFRICAN PROSE
WILLIAM GOLDING: Lord Of The Flies
Comment on Jack's leadership style
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, Jack Merridew rises from head of the choir to chief of a savage tribe, and his leadership style stands in stark opposition to Ralph's. Jack governs by force, fear and the appeal to primitive instinct, and his style is Golding's chief image of tyranny and the triumph of savagery over civilisation.
Autocratic and power-hungry. From the outset Jack craves authority. Resentful at losing the election for chief, he sets up his own group in which he alone commands. He rules not by consent but by domination, silencing dissent and demanding unquestioning obedience. Where Ralph consults the assembly and respects the conch, Jack tramples on democratic order.
Rule by fear and violence. Jack maintains control through intimidation. He beats the boys, ties up and tortures Wilfred for no stated reason, and terrorises the others into submission. The threat of punishment, rather than reasoned persuasion, keeps his followers in line. Fear of the "beast", which he manipulates, further binds the group to him.
Appeal to instinct: hunting, meat and ritual. Jack wins followers by offering what Ralph cannot: the excitement of the hunt, the feast of meat, the release of the painted dance. He exploits the boys' hunger and their craving for thrill and belonging. The painted face frees him and his hunters from shame and unleashes their cruelty.
Charismatic but destructive. Jack is bold, energetic and commanding, qualities that draw the boys to him, but his leadership serves only his own power and the group's descent into barbarism. Under him the fire is neglected, order collapses, and the tribe turns to murder, killing Simon and hunting Ralph.
Symbolic meaning. Jack represents dictatorship, the rule of brute force and the darkness in human nature. His style embodies the political fear at the heart of the novel: how easily civilisation gives way to tyranny when instinct is loosed.
In short, Jack leads through autocracy, fear and the seductions of savagery, and his rise charts the collapse of order into chaos.
Detalles de la respuesta
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, Jack Merridew rises from head of the choir to chief of a savage tribe, and his leadership style stands in stark opposition to Ralph's. Jack governs by force, fear and the appeal to primitive instinct, and his style is Golding's chief image of tyranny and the triumph of savagery over civilisation.
Autocratic and power-hungry. From the outset Jack craves authority. Resentful at losing the election for chief, he sets up his own group in which he alone commands. He rules not by consent but by domination, silencing dissent and demanding unquestioning obedience. Where Ralph consults the assembly and respects the conch, Jack tramples on democratic order.
Rule by fear and violence. Jack maintains control through intimidation. He beats the boys, ties up and tortures Wilfred for no stated reason, and terrorises the others into submission. The threat of punishment, rather than reasoned persuasion, keeps his followers in line. Fear of the "beast", which he manipulates, further binds the group to him.
Appeal to instinct: hunting, meat and ritual. Jack wins followers by offering what Ralph cannot: the excitement of the hunt, the feast of meat, the release of the painted dance. He exploits the boys' hunger and their craving for thrill and belonging. The painted face frees him and his hunters from shame and unleashes their cruelty.
Charismatic but destructive. Jack is bold, energetic and commanding, qualities that draw the boys to him, but his leadership serves only his own power and the group's descent into barbarism. Under him the fire is neglected, order collapses, and the tribe turns to murder, killing Simon and hunting Ralph.
Symbolic meaning. Jack represents dictatorship, the rule of brute force and the darkness in human nature. His style embodies the political fear at the heart of the novel: how easily civilisation gives way to tyranny when instinct is loosed.
In short, Jack leads through autocracy, fear and the seductions of savagery, and his rise charts the collapse of order into chaos.
Pregunta 6 Informe
AFRICAN PROSE
ASARE KONADU: A Woman In Her Prime
Comment on the significance of the search for Yaw Boakye
In Asare Konadu's A Woman in Her Prime, the disappearance of Yaw Boakye and the communal search for him form a significant strand of village life that Konadu weaves around Pokuwaa's own story. Though it seems a separate incident, the episode carries meaning for the novel's larger concerns.
It portrays communal solidarity. When Yaw Boakye goes missing, the whole community is drawn into the effort to find him. Villagers, hunters and elders join the search, showing how, in the traditional Akan society Konadu depicts, the misfortune of one member becomes the concern of all. The search dramatises the closeness and mutual responsibility of village life, the same communal fabric that surrounds and pressures Pokuwaa.
It reveals the hold of superstition and belief. The reaction to the disappearance exposes how the community interprets misfortune through spiritual and superstitious lenses, invoking the gods, omens and the workings of unseen forces. This reinforces the novel's picture of a society governed by traditional beliefs, the very beliefs Pokuwaa must negotiate in her quest for a child.
It provides realistic social texture. The episode enriches the novel's depiction of everyday village existence, its rhythms of work, gossip, anxiety and cooperation. It grounds Pokuwaa's private drama in a fully realised community rather than an abstract setting.
It parallels Pokuwaa's own searching. Just as the village searches for the missing man, Pokuwaa is engaged in her own long search, for a child and for peace of mind. The two searches echo one another, and the resolution of the communal anxiety mirrors the eventual easing of Pokuwaa's.
Thus the search for Yaw Boakye is not a mere digression but a device that deepens the reader's sense of communal life, the power of tradition and superstition, and the theme of searching that runs through the whole novel.
Detalles de la respuesta
In Asare Konadu's A Woman in Her Prime, the disappearance of Yaw Boakye and the communal search for him form a significant strand of village life that Konadu weaves around Pokuwaa's own story. Though it seems a separate incident, the episode carries meaning for the novel's larger concerns.
It portrays communal solidarity. When Yaw Boakye goes missing, the whole community is drawn into the effort to find him. Villagers, hunters and elders join the search, showing how, in the traditional Akan society Konadu depicts, the misfortune of one member becomes the concern of all. The search dramatises the closeness and mutual responsibility of village life, the same communal fabric that surrounds and pressures Pokuwaa.
It reveals the hold of superstition and belief. The reaction to the disappearance exposes how the community interprets misfortune through spiritual and superstitious lenses, invoking the gods, omens and the workings of unseen forces. This reinforces the novel's picture of a society governed by traditional beliefs, the very beliefs Pokuwaa must negotiate in her quest for a child.
It provides realistic social texture. The episode enriches the novel's depiction of everyday village existence, its rhythms of work, gossip, anxiety and cooperation. It grounds Pokuwaa's private drama in a fully realised community rather than an abstract setting.
It parallels Pokuwaa's own searching. Just as the village searches for the missing man, Pokuwaa is engaged in her own long search, for a child and for peace of mind. The two searches echo one another, and the resolution of the communal anxiety mirrors the eventual easing of Pokuwaa's.
Thus the search for Yaw Boakye is not a mere digression but a device that deepens the reader's sense of communal life, the power of tradition and superstition, and the theme of searching that runs through the whole novel.
Pregunta 7 Informe
NON — AFRICAN PROSE
WILLIAM GOLDING: Lord Of The Flies
Discuss fear as a dominant theme in the novel.
Fear is arguably the dominant theme in William Golding's Lord of the Flies. From the moment the boys find themselves alone on the island, fear works quietly and steadily to unravel their fragile order, driving them from reasoned cooperation towards superstition, cruelty and savagery.
Fear of the "beast". The most obvious form of fear is the boys' dread of an imagined monster. It begins with the small boy with the mulberry birthmark who speaks of a "snake-thing", and grows until the beast dominates the assemblies. Because the little ones cannot distinguish nightmare from reality, the fear spreads and hardens into shared belief. The sighting of the dead parachutist, mistaken for the beast, seems to confirm it.
Fear of the unknown and the dark. The island at night, its noises and shadows, breeds terror. Fear feeds on ignorance; the boys people the darkness with horrors of their own making. Golding shows how, cut off from the adult world, the mind manufactures its own demons.
Fear as a tool of power. Jack exploits fear to seize and hold control. By keeping the idea of the beast alive, and by offering sacrifices to it, he binds the boys to himself and justifies his tyranny. Fear becomes the foundation of his savage regime, showing how terror can be manipulated for political ends.
The true location of fear: within. Simon alone grasps the deepest truth, that the beast is not an external creature but the darkness inside the boys themselves: "maybe it's only us". The Lord of the Flies, the pig's head, voices this insight, telling Simon the beast is part of him and cannot be hunted or killed. Fear is therefore ultimately fear of human nature's own capacity for evil.
The consequences of fear. Fear destroys reason and morality. It leads to the frenzied killing of Simon, the hunting of Ralph, and the collapse of every civilised restraint. Piggy's death and the burning island are its final fruits.
Thus fear pervades the novel from first to last, and Golding uses it to reveal how easily terror, whether of an imagined beast or of the darkness within, can reduce human beings to savagery.
Detalles de la respuesta
Fear is arguably the dominant theme in William Golding's Lord of the Flies. From the moment the boys find themselves alone on the island, fear works quietly and steadily to unravel their fragile order, driving them from reasoned cooperation towards superstition, cruelty and savagery.
Fear of the "beast". The most obvious form of fear is the boys' dread of an imagined monster. It begins with the small boy with the mulberry birthmark who speaks of a "snake-thing", and grows until the beast dominates the assemblies. Because the little ones cannot distinguish nightmare from reality, the fear spreads and hardens into shared belief. The sighting of the dead parachutist, mistaken for the beast, seems to confirm it.
Fear of the unknown and the dark. The island at night, its noises and shadows, breeds terror. Fear feeds on ignorance; the boys people the darkness with horrors of their own making. Golding shows how, cut off from the adult world, the mind manufactures its own demons.
Fear as a tool of power. Jack exploits fear to seize and hold control. By keeping the idea of the beast alive, and by offering sacrifices to it, he binds the boys to himself and justifies his tyranny. Fear becomes the foundation of his savage regime, showing how terror can be manipulated for political ends.
The true location of fear: within. Simon alone grasps the deepest truth, that the beast is not an external creature but the darkness inside the boys themselves: "maybe it's only us". The Lord of the Flies, the pig's head, voices this insight, telling Simon the beast is part of him and cannot be hunted or killed. Fear is therefore ultimately fear of human nature's own capacity for evil.
The consequences of fear. Fear destroys reason and morality. It leads to the frenzied killing of Simon, the hunting of Ralph, and the collapse of every civilised restraint. Piggy's death and the burning island are its final fruits.
Thus fear pervades the novel from first to last, and Golding uses it to reveal how easily terror, whether of an imagined beast or of the darkness within, can reduce human beings to savagery.
Pregunta 8 Informe
NON — AFRICAN PROSE
ERNEST HEMINGWAY: The Old Man and The Sea
Discuss Santiago's struggle with the Marlin.
The struggle between Santiago and the great marlin forms the heart of Ernest Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea. It is at once a gripping physical contest and a profound test of the old fisherman's courage, endurance and dignity.
The hooking and the long haul. After eighty-four days without a catch, Santiago finally hooks an enormous marlin far out in the Gulf Stream. The fish is so powerful that instead of being pulled in, it tows the skiff for two days and two nights. Santiago cannot see the fish for most of this time; he can only hold the line across his back and shoulders, giving line when he must and taking it back when he can. The strain cuts his hands, cramps his body and exhausts his ageing frame.
Endurance and suffering. The struggle becomes an ordeal of physical suffering. His hands are lacerated by the line, one hand cramps and "betrays" him, his back aches and he goes without proper food or sleep. Yet he refuses to give up, repeating his resolve to prove "what a man can do and what a man endures". His stamina is drawn partly from memories of his youthful strength, such as the great arm-wrestling match he recalls.
Respect for a worthy adversary. Santiago comes to love and admire the marlin, calling it his brother and pitying it even as he is determined to kill it. The fish is noble, beautiful and stronger than any he has known, and the contest is one of mutual worthiness rather than mere hunting. This respect ennobles the struggle and gives it a spiritual dimension.
The kill and its bitter aftermath. At last the marlin circles closer and Santiago drives his harpoon into its heart, killing it. He lashes the huge fish alongside the skiff to sail home in triumph. But the victory is short-lived: sharks, drawn by the blood, attack the carcass, and despite Santiago's desperate defence they strip the marlin to a skeleton. He reaches shore with only bones to show for his heroic effort.
Meaning of the struggle. Though Santiago loses the flesh of his catch, he is not defeated in spirit; "a man can be destroyed but not defeated". The struggle affirms human courage, perseverance and dignity in the face of a merciless nature.
Santiago's fight with the marlin is thus both a thrilling sea adventure and a moving parable of the unconquerable human spirit.
Detalles de la respuesta
The struggle between Santiago and the great marlin forms the heart of Ernest Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea. It is at once a gripping physical contest and a profound test of the old fisherman's courage, endurance and dignity.
The hooking and the long haul. After eighty-four days without a catch, Santiago finally hooks an enormous marlin far out in the Gulf Stream. The fish is so powerful that instead of being pulled in, it tows the skiff for two days and two nights. Santiago cannot see the fish for most of this time; he can only hold the line across his back and shoulders, giving line when he must and taking it back when he can. The strain cuts his hands, cramps his body and exhausts his ageing frame.
Endurance and suffering. The struggle becomes an ordeal of physical suffering. His hands are lacerated by the line, one hand cramps and "betrays" him, his back aches and he goes without proper food or sleep. Yet he refuses to give up, repeating his resolve to prove "what a man can do and what a man endures". His stamina is drawn partly from memories of his youthful strength, such as the great arm-wrestling match he recalls.
Respect for a worthy adversary. Santiago comes to love and admire the marlin, calling it his brother and pitying it even as he is determined to kill it. The fish is noble, beautiful and stronger than any he has known, and the contest is one of mutual worthiness rather than mere hunting. This respect ennobles the struggle and gives it a spiritual dimension.
The kill and its bitter aftermath. At last the marlin circles closer and Santiago drives his harpoon into its heart, killing it. He lashes the huge fish alongside the skiff to sail home in triumph. But the victory is short-lived: sharks, drawn by the blood, attack the carcass, and despite Santiago's desperate defence they strip the marlin to a skeleton. He reaches shore with only bones to show for his heroic effort.
Meaning of the struggle. Though Santiago loses the flesh of his catch, he is not defeated in spirit; "a man can be destroyed but not defeated". The struggle affirms human courage, perseverance and dignity in the face of a merciless nature.
Santiago's fight with the marlin is thus both a thrilling sea adventure and a moving parable of the unconquerable human spirit.
¿Te gustaría proceder con esta acción?