Reflecting In Terms Of Creative Thinking And Decision Making With Regards To The Research Project
Übersicht
Six marks in the individual project cannot be earned by working harder, reading more or writing better. They are awarded for something no amount of research produces: an honest, detailed and insightful account of how you thought, what you decided, what you got wrong and what you can now do that you could not do in September. They are also the six marks most often thrown away, because almost every candidate writes the same three sentences about having enjoyed the project and learned a lot.
This lesson is about the two things the specification names here: critically evaluating and reflecting on your own performance and the skills you acquired, and critically evaluating and reflecting on your presentation evidence. Both are framed by the topic's own title, which is about creative thinking and decision making. You will reconstruct a real decision, rewrite a reflection that scores 1 into one that scores 6, and learn to read the record of your own presentation questioning as evidence rather than as an embarrassment.
Ziele
- Critically evaluate and reflect on own performance and skills acquired.
- Critically evaluate and reflect on presentation evidence.
Mindmap
Dieses Thema ist als Karte dargestellt, damit die Zusammenhange sichtbar werden.
Mindmap in der App offnen
Lektionshinweis
Vollstaendige Lernnotiz in der Green Bridge App
Holen Sie sich die Green Bridge CBT App auf Handy oder Computer fuer die komplette IGCSE-Bibliothek: fruehere Pruefungen, Bewertungsschemata, Mindmaps, Lernkarten und Audiolektionen.
Unterrichtsbewertung
Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum Abschluss der Lektion über Reflecting In Terms Of Creative Thinking And Decision Making With Regards To The Research Project. Jetzt, da Sie die wichtigsten Konzepte und Ideen erkundet haben,
Sie werden auf eine Mischung verschiedener Fragetypen stoßen, darunter Multiple-Choice-Fragen, Kurzantwortfragen und Aufsatzfragen. Jede Frage ist sorgfältig ausgearbeitet, um verschiedene Aspekte Ihres Wissens und Ihrer kritischen Denkfähigkeiten zu bewerten.
Nutzen Sie diesen Bewertungsteil als Gelegenheit, Ihr Verständnis des Themas zu festigen und Bereiche zu identifizieren, in denen Sie möglicherweise zusätzlichen Lernbedarf haben.
- Which criterion assesses evaluation of the individual project's process, product and the candidate's own learning? A. IP1 B. IP2 C. IP4 D. IP5 Answer: D
- Which of these is reflection rather than narration? A. First I planned, then I researched, then I wrote up B. I enjoyed the project and found it interesting C. Every delay came from waiting for a reply, so I would schedule dependencies first with a fallback D. I collected my data in October and November Answer: C
- What is meant by divergent thinking in a project? A. Disagreeing with your supervisor B. Deliberately generating more options than you need before choosing C. Changing your title after the proposal D. Using several different referencing styles Answer: B
- Why does naming what a decision cost strengthen a reflection? A. It makes the report longer B. It shows the writer understood the trade being made rather than defending the choice C. It is required by the word limit D. It replaces the need for evidence Answer: B
- What overall weighting does AO4 carry across the whole qualification? A. 11% B. 23.5% C. 31.5% D. 34% Answer: B
Bearbeiten Sie diese Fragen in der App
Bearbeiten Sie diese Fragen in der App
Empfohlene Bücher
Übungsklausuren üben
Möchten Sie Übungsklausuren zu Reflecting In Terms Of Creative Thinking And Decision Making With Regards To The Research Project üben? Laden Sie die Green Bridge CBT App herunter, um Übungsklausuren und vollständige Prüfungssimulationen zu diesem Thema zu erhalten.
Lade die App im Google Playstore herunter.
Alles, was du brauchst, um in JAMB, WAEC & NECO zu glänzen.
